Crush: Herman Melville, the Failed Writer

Why I love Herman Melville:


One day Melville, a young academic in his 20s, randomly decided to set off on a whaling ship. The captain turned out to be a cruel, hard-driving leader, and Melville deserted the ship in the Marquesas, where he lived among cannibals for three weeks before finding another ship. No, seriously. This experience drove the storyline of his two first novels, Typee and Omoo, which were wildly popular and widely disbelieved.

Capitalizing on his success, Melville continued to write using his whaling experiences. But as he grew older, he became more introspective and philosophical. Melville’s mature writing finally culminated in Moby Dick.


It was a complete critical and commercial failure.


Here’s what one contemporary critic had to say:

We have no intention of quoting any passages just now from Moby Dick. TheLondon journals, we understand, ‘have bestowed upon the work many flattering notices,’ and we should be loth to combat such high authority. But if there are any of our readers who wish to find examples of bad rhetoric, involved syntax, stilted sentiment and incoherent English, we will take the liberty of recommending to them this precious volume of Mr. Melville’s.

–New York United States Magazine and Democratic Review, January 1852.

That delightfully vitriolic passage is, ironically, read today only because of its association with the American classic.


Moby Dick failed. Alienated and troubled, Melville continued to publish but was unable to regain a large audience. He died working as a deputy customs inspector. One of his obituaries stated, “even his own generation has long thought him dead.” Ouch.

So why do we read this book today? Why is it considered one of the most important books ever written by an American? Thank Raymond Weaver, the first biographer of Melville. His 1921 biography and his 1924 edition of Melville’s unpublished Billy Budd placed the author in the spotlight, where his works could be re-examined.  Through Weaver’s work, critics read Moby-Dick again, 75 years later. And they found the Great American Novel.


8 Comments Add yours

  1. W. Smith says:

    Moby Dick is a great novel! A little long winded at times (e.g. the whaling expo parts) but I could go on for hours about Queequeg, the cook, morality and the ideal man.

    1. We need to get together and have a Moby-Dick marathon chat!

  2. rodsword says:

    Rebecca, did you read Why Read Moby-Dick? by Nathaniel Philbrick? If so, what are your thoughts?

    1. I have read it. I very much appreciated the liberal quoting of Moby-Dick itself. He picked some great passages and helped make others more accessible to a modern audience. I thought his chapters were too short, though. Just when you’re beginning to digest and think about a theme, it’s over. Each treatment seemed slightly shallow to me because of the length. But I definitely think it serves its purpose: to interest a modern audience in reading the book and to get them excited about it.

  3. Rod Rodriguez says:

    Rebecca, thank you for your insight, it’s greatly valued! I’ve enjoyed several of Mr. Philbrick’s other books, yet I too found that a few of these chapters were cut to short. At the moment a chapter was beginning to come alive, it abruptly ended! Maybe it is Mr. Philbrick’s intent to get the reader to delve into the actual book so that Mr. Melville could transport you all the way back with the crew of the Pequod. Happy Readings!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s